<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deanna Zandt &#187; time magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deannazandt.com/tags/time-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deannazandt.com</link>
	<description>Media technologist and author in Brooklyn, NY.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Person of the year: Me! You! Everybody!</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2006/12/18/person-of-the-year-me-you-everybody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deannazandt.com/2006/12/18/person-of-the-year-me-you-everybody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deanna zandt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/2006/12/18/person-of-the-year-me-you-everybody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well, wellÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ it's all the rage for these 15 seconds, but Time has basically crowned "Web 2.0" the official whiz-bang-iess thing out there right now. It's all about you and me, and what we do with ourselves online these days. I read a really great post over at Read/Write Web dissecting what Time got right, and what they got terribly wrongÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ man, this is such a strange media moment.

Brian Williams, the darling of NBC, had this to say:

<blockquote>We work every bit as hard as our television-news forebears did at gathering, writing and presenting the day's news but to a smaller audience, from which many have been lured away by a dazzling array of choices and the chance to make their own news.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, well&#8230; it&#8217;ll be all the rage for these next 15 seconds, but <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html">Time has basically crowned &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;</a> the official whiz-bang-iest thing out there right now. It&#8217;s all about you and me, and what we do with ourselves online these days. I read a great post over at <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/62927792/time_person_of_the_year_2006.php">Read/Write Web</a> dissecting what <em>Time</em> got right, and what they got terribly wrong  (note: this is <i>not</i> a &#8220;revolution&#8221;)&#8230; man, this is such a strange media moment.</p>
<p>Brian Williams, the darling of NBC, had <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570707,00.html">this to say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We work every bit as hard as our television-news forebears did at gathering, writing and presenting the day&#8217;s news but to a smaller audience, from which many have been lured away by a dazzling array of choices and the chance to make their own news.</p></blockquote>
<p>Err&#8230; um, well, <em>no</em>. Trust me, Brian, those folks not watching the evening news, it&#8217;s not because they&#8217;re off blogging. (Mom? Remember, we talked about &#8220;blogging&#8221; &#8212; people writing their own news, opinions and analysis in an online journal. <a href="http://www.deannazandt.com/2006/11/29/media-consortium-presentation-materials/">Here&#8217;s the presentation</a> I did for you guys over Thanksgiving.) </p>
<p>Most people are fed up with mainstream journalism pushing one side of a story <em>(hello, WMD!)</em>, the ridiculous celebrity obsessions <em>(she showed her what? I still don&#8217;t care)</em>, the reign of <strong>infotainment</strong>  &#8212; which has its own <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infotainment">Wikipedia</a> entry, by the way&#8211; over corporate news. That &#8220;dazzling array of choices&#8221; isn&#8217;t just the magpie-effect, Bri. That&#8217;s the &#8220;looking for the whole, real story&#8221; effect. They&#8217;re mostly not blogging, but they <em>are</em> seeking <a href="http://www.alternet.org">independent sources of news</a>. And that&#8217;s what NBC should have been worried about <em>eons</em> ago, when the interweb first landed on your doorstep.</p>
<p>The other thing that kills me about these discussions are the people decrying the end of culture, news, life as we know it. Just because a bunch of people <a href="http://www.digg.com/">digg</a> a video showing a guy getting kicked in the package doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT7E0vwlYYM">some valid attempts at art on YouTube</a>. Does anyone actually still watch &#8220;America&#8217;s Home Videos?&#8221; I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s still on the air, and that hasn&#8217;t ended the movie industry, has it? Making creative production easier doesn&#8217;t, on its own, reduce the value of something. Inspiration and humanity = still required components of producing worthwhile culture.</p>
<p>I work with some media organizations that are tackling the issues of what to do with this stuff right now. I reinforce with a few of them the idea that hardcore journalism is not going to be eradicated, ever. People will continue to look for their fluff and their in-depth analysis and reporting; I know plenty of New Yorkers who read both the <em>Times</em> and the <em>Post</em>. It&#8217;s a media <em>ecology</em> people. It&#8217;s getting bigger and bigger, which is a Good Thing &#8482;. People will always look for content from sources that they trust; it&#8217;s that the way the trust gets earned is changing, and that messes with the mainstream/corporate brain like nobody&#8217;s business. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m more excited by the stuff I see out there every day. Places like <a href="http://cruxy.com/">Cruxy</a> are exploding with content that blows TV outta the water. So, when Brian Williams and the other mainstream folks put on their sourpuss faces for the 2.0 <strong><em>e</em></strong>volution, you can just tell them: <em>Awwww, you&#8217;re just jealous</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deannazandt.com/2006/12/18/person-of-the-year-me-you-everybody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
