<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Company&#8217;s &#8220;Influence Project:&#8221; Maybe call it the &#8220;Popularity Contest&#8221; instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/</link>
	<description>Media technologist and author in Brooklyn, NY.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22619</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22619</guid>
		<description>Sup, D? :)

I wrote about it also: http://billcammack.com/2010/07/07/thoughts-about-the-fast-company-influence-project/

The problem is that this isn&#039;t influence at all.  Besides the fact that you pointed out that early adopters benefit from the pyramid scheme, all it measures is how many people someone can trick into clicking on a link.

On top of that, once someone gets to the site, they will advertise it to other people for their own reasons, not because the so-called &quot;influencer&quot; persuaded them that this was something they needed to get behind.

It&#039;s basically like when they have those &quot;hottest chick on the web&quot; and &quot;hottest guy on the web&quot; contests and an actually HAWT chick gets the most votes and some busted dude gets the most votes because he happens to be the most popular.

Reach isn&#039;t influence.  The statistics on CPC advertising bear that out.  You can show an advertisement to 1,000 people and it doesn&#039;t net you a single penny if nobody clicks on the ad.  You&#039;re not influencing anyone to take any valuable action.. unless you count page hits to Fast Company because of people getting their followers to click on shortened URLs as &quot;valuable&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sup, D? :)</p>
<p>I wrote about it also: <a href="http://billcammack.com/2010/07/07/thoughts-about-the-fast-company-influence-project/" rel="nofollow">http://billcammack.com/2010/07/07/thoughts-about-the-fast-company-influence-project/</a></p>
<p>The problem is that this isn&#8217;t influence at all.  Besides the fact that you pointed out that early adopters benefit from the pyramid scheme, all it measures is how many people someone can trick into clicking on a link.</p>
<p>On top of that, once someone gets to the site, they will advertise it to other people for their own reasons, not because the so-called &#8220;influencer&#8221; persuaded them that this was something they needed to get behind.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically like when they have those &#8220;hottest chick on the web&#8221; and &#8220;hottest guy on the web&#8221; contests and an actually HAWT chick gets the most votes and some busted dude gets the most votes because he happens to be the most popular.</p>
<p>Reach isn&#8217;t influence.  The statistics on CPC advertising bear that out.  You can show an advertisement to 1,000 people and it doesn&#8217;t net you a single penny if nobody clicks on the ad.  You&#8217;re not influencing anyone to take any valuable action.. unless you count page hits to Fast Company because of people getting their followers to click on shortened URLs as &#8220;valuable&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talk:2, o Blog da Talk &#187; A diferença entre popularidade e influência em Mídias Sociais</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22226</link>
		<dc:creator>Talk:2, o Blog da Talk &#187; A diferença entre popularidade e influência em Mídias Sociais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22226</guid>
		<description>[...] a pouco coloco o gráfico de buzz monitoring aqui, mas vejam alguns exemplos: aqui, aqui e aqui [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a pouco coloco o gráfico de buzz monitoring aqui, mas vejam alguns exemplos: aqui, aqui e aqui [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanna zandt</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22179</link>
		<dc:creator>deanna zandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22179</guid>
		<description>@Rod: *snicker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rod: *snicker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Begbie</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22178</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Begbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22178</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s only one sensible way to deal with this… Go vote for my basset hound, Bacon! http://fcinf.com/v/atd6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s only one sensible way to deal with this… Go vote for my basset hound, Bacon! <a href="http://fcinf.com/v/atd6" rel="nofollow">http://fcinf.com/v/atd6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22143</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22143</guid>
		<description>And a gimmick to get attention for their upcoming magazine issue on influence!  Although the flash depictions of a little SNA of the people who clicked are interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a gimmick to get attention for their upcoming magazine issue on influence!  Although the flash depictions of a little SNA of the people who clicked are interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanna zandt</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22134</link>
		<dc:creator>deanna zandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22134</guid>
		<description>heh, exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gilliam</title>
		<link>http://www.deannazandt.com/2010/07/06/fast-companys-influence-project-maybe-call-it-the-popularity-contest-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-22133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gilliam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deannazandt.com/?p=28314#comment-22133</guid>
		<description>It does sound like a good way to generate pageviews though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does sound like a good way to generate pageviews though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
